2.
436
3
Solicitor I advised in familiar language on the matters arising out of Stanford's case rather in the character of Solicitor with a
practical object than the giving of
opinion on the Law; and before
an
a muu
opinion
of the highest nonjudicial weight was Anight
I submist that the frets
and Groumstances.
about to be submitted to the Attorney and
al should have been presented
Solicitor
ti me
for
General
serious consideration and
expressed opinion
Instead of this
formally
justice
ti
me as a..
lawyer a
disjointed Correspondence has been as I presume been
presented
to those high legal officers and I am surprised. that, under such circumstances in the main points raised my practical directions have been identical with the opinion of those learned Lawyers.
In a matter of detail however it ought not to be subject for surprise that the opinion given differs from what appears to have been in accurately assumed to have been mine. The opinion contains
the
following passage.
But we are
of opinion that the delivery up of
"goods by the Inperintendent ought not to have been "made subject (as it appears to have been to an
"undertaking
זי
ow
the part of the claimants to pay
" any portion of the general expenses of the Police
"incurred with reter
"For instance as
reference
to the goods in question.
appears by the Setter of the~
"Superintendent of Police to the Colonial Secretary
of the 27th August 1862 a
part of these expenses
"Consists of outtay in the detention of the mate
the Tropic for the purpose of giving
"and clerk of the Tropic for
"evidence on
the trial of Stanford."
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.